Tag Archives: letters

Letters to the Editor – 12/27/2023

From the 12/27/23 Courier:

Against American Birthright Standard

After listening to a recent televised interview with WPSD board member Mick Bates promoting the American Birthright Standards, I can see why the Colorado State Board of Education has rejected that manifesto.

While promoting the ABS, Bates said; “We’re going to look at the true history of this country.” Continuing he said, “One simple example is, yes, we had slavery, but we were the first to get rid of it. It’s a long story but it’s a good story. It’s a positive story because we ended slavery and I want our children to get the real history and education about America, this great country.”

Yes, we are a great Country, but the United States was far from being the “first” to end slavery. In fact, we were one of the last. And it took the deaths of 620,000 soldiers to abolish it. Enslavement ended here only with pro-slavery forces going down kicking and screaming the whole way.

As a former student of WPHS over 55 years ago, I can only hope that our children are not indoctrinated by what I feel is a John Birch type of system that is promoted by some who subscribe to a fairy-tale time where White Anglo-Saxon Protestants were the dominant force in America. That faction, in my opinion, has one thing in mind, take America back to 1950, where some are kept in the back of the bus and others in the closet. And those cantankerous females of today, back in the kitchen.

Steve PluttLake George

Gaslighting the new normal?

In January’s school board meeting, Rusterholz spoke about transparency going forward, healing the divide. Already, however, named board roles, policies and money spent outside the county were decisions moved forward without Barkley or parents. A key school leader was fired without explanation. I’d like to know how Barkley was included in that decision made a full two weeks after she took her oath?

How is this transparent? Is Gaslighting the New Normal?

No incumbents stood up for parents or students during the campaign. Instead, calling students parents’ puppets, teachers the enemy, and candidates were mislabeled union puppets. Barkley was called a lame duck the day after she was elected.

None countered media that misrepresented challengers, all accepted Republican party money, aligning at public events despite boards being apolitical.

Illingworth harassed parents by name online, calling them liars with no evidence.

Before the election, Bates called a locked-out board crowd rabble-rousers instead of addressing the community of parents and teachers displaced by religious folks instructed to line up early. When I talked with strangers standing near me if they had children or grandchildren in the schools, the occasional Merit parent said yes. I asked others why they were there – “I was told to be here.”

Meanwhile, inside, religious people prayed from the microphone and scolded the heathens in the room, depriving actual parents their monthly 3-minute voice.

How is this transparent, humane, or anything but gaslighting? I remind this board that nearly 50% of citizens voted against this behavior.

Trina HoeflingFlorissant

Thank you to Kevin Burr

On December 15th, Woodland Park School District Central Office released Kevin Burr from his position as Principal of Woodland Park High School. In their announcement, no reason was given, nor was Kevin’s name even mentioned. As a parent of a junior at WPHS who has felt supported by Mr. Burr, I was left feeling very disoriented and disappointed. I would like to take an opportunity to thank Kevin for his accomplishments at WPHS since 2018. Some highlights include:

An increase in WPHS SAT scores every year for the last five years

Expanding our course offerings with a cybersecurity series and criminology series (supporting a law enforcement track)

Significant growth in college opportunities at WPHS. Kevin wrote a grant that allowed four of our teachers to get their Masters degrees so that they could teach college level courses at WPHS in math, science, english and social studies. He built partnerships with UCCS and Pikes Peak State College which allow for concurrent enrollment opportunities

Increasing career opportunities where students are graduating with industry certificates in culinary arts, welding, graphic design, and computer science

Keeping students in school and accountable through the COVID 19 pandemic

US News and World Report recognizing WPHS as one of the Best High Schools in Colorado in 2022/23

WPHS receiving a Level 1 Certification from Marzano High Reliability Schools for a Safe, Supportive and Collaborative culture

Thank you, Kevin, for supporting academics and also our athletics and arts programs. Thank you for making WPHS stronger.

Khurshid RogersWoodland Park

Letters to the Editor – 11/15/2023

From the 11/15/2023 Courier:

Close race should be a message

We were so proud to be a part of the campaign for Keegan, Mike and Seth. They ran a clean, honest campaign without negative false attacks on their opponents. We personally know them. They are good people of this community whose only concern is for a strong public school system that offers a valid academic curriculum with appropriate support structures in place.

Of course, the election did not completely go in the direction we had hoped. However, there is an important outcome that needs to be stated. The election results were close. Very close, which means almost 50% of the voters selected the above candidates. That 50% of voters included many traditional conservative voters who disregarded the false accusations against the candidates.

This election should never have been about politics. It should only have been about education. If the new board listens carefully to all of the voters, all the parents, all the taxpayers, they may be much more in line with the values of the whole community.

True leadership includes compromise, compassion and commitment to open conversation. It does not include bullying and closed-door deals or stacking meetings with young people who have no connection to the community other than the courses taken at the local bible school and being bused to the voter polls. The 50% of the community that voted against the present board are here to stay and are watching.

Michael Stewart and Darlene Schmurr-StewartWoodland Park

Outside influencers

As a fascinated outsider looking in, I believe that the two incumbents who won re-election surely must realize that their razor thin victories were due exclusively to Andrew Wommack and his Christian nationalist group known as the Truth and Liberty Coalition.

This should be a frightening wakeup call to the residents of Woodland Park and Teller County. Unless of course, in the not-too-distant future, you are at ease of living in a hierocracy with a religious autocrat in control.

Steve PluttLake George

Letters to the Editor (Canon City)

Woodland Park school district has had a rough couple of years. Seeing similar efforts being made in districts across the state, I wrote this letter to the editor for the Daily Record down in Canon City:

School Board Elections Matter

I write to you as a concerned parent in the Woodland Part RE-2 school district.  I fear Cañon City may be on the brink of embarking on the same path we started on nearly two years ago.

In 2021, Woodland Park voted in what initially appeared to be normal school board elections.  Four candidates ran together as a slate, labeling themselves “the conservative choice,” and as you might expect for a conservative community like ours, those candidates won the election and assumed control of the board.  Their actions in the nearly two years since then have shocked residents regardless of political affiliation.

It soon became evident that this new board sought a complete restructuring of our school district, a vision taking us far beyond what any of us had imagined.  We observed a board operating in secrecy, being fiscally irresponsible, and fostering such a poor working environment that this past year, around 40% of staff left the district, with one of the schools losing two-thirds of their teachers.  The board consistently makes significant decisions without consulting the community.  Legal fees have skyrocketed and the district is battling multiple lawsuits.

The result is a shattered school district, a divided community, and an overwhelming bipartisan opposition to the current school board.  You’ll find plenty of information on the internet, as reporters at both the state and national levels have been captivated by our ordeal.

In this election, Woodland Park voters choose who will be tasked with rebuilding a shattered school district and mending our community.

When Cañon City residents vote, you’ll be voting on a path to take.  Don’t make that decision lightly.  Please don’t follow in our footsteps without fully understanding what awaits.  Don’t repeat the mistakes made in Woodland Park.

Matt Gawlowski,
Woodland Park

Letters to the Editor – November 1, 2023

From today’s Courier:

Schools should be nonpartisan

I have lived in Woodland Park for 25 years. I have put my heart and soul into our school district for 12 of those years as a parent and involved and enthusiastic volunteer. Over the years, I would guess that I have worked closely with hundreds of other community members on everything from mopping cafeteria floors after Thanksgiving lunches to serving on superintendent selection committees.

I have enjoyed and valued those connections deeply. Never did someone’s politics matter when we were cheering kids on at the Walkathon or building school gardens. We always worked together with the common goal of supporting all kids.

My hope is that people remember this when voting for school board candidates in these next few days. We don’t need to vote in line with or against any political party. School board races are meant to be non-partisan for a reason. Political party affiliation does not determine how we come together for kids. What matters are our values of cooperation, understanding, inclusivity, kindness, and caring for each others’ families. I feel the focus on these common values has diminished over the past two years and I desperately want our community to get that back.

I support Barkley, Bryant and Knott because they are not running on a political platform and they are running on the promise of listening, engaging with stakeholders, and rebuilding trust through transparency and respect. I believe they will help us refocus on common values that will benefit all our students and community.

Khurshid Rogers, Woodland Park

Educators are not the enemy

Ask yourself: If your child went to school and was taught to think of themselves as anything different than what they are, would you keep them there? If they were sexualized at an early age, would you sit back and allow it to happen? If your students went to classrooms or to participate in sports or the arts and their teachers and coaches groomed them, would you sit back and say nothing?

My guess is that you would throw a fit. You might pull your child. You would certainly complain to administration. You might attend school board meetings and demand change. Perhaps you would sue the district.

Recently there has been a lot of accusations thrown at our staff. They have been called groomers (which means pedophiles), Marxists, and unAmerican. Our staff has been belittled and accused of all the worst things.

And yet…

We have never had a lawsuit over a student being groomed or taught to be a gender other than what they are. We have never seen a teacher sued for creating an unhealthy expectation of what a student should be.

You have had kids in this district for years. You trusted these teachers and coaches with your children. So have your friends and family. Why? Because these things are not happening in Woodland Park. They never have.

Vote for change. Vote for BOE members who did not think of our educators and coaches as the enemy. Vote Bryant, Barkley and Knott.

Kelly Hunsaker, Woodland Park

What do you want children to learn?

From a young age, I have been distrustful of people in positions of power, even more so those who actively seek these positions. Publicly voicing support for candidates goes against my better judgment and I’ve never done so, until now. The vile letter of support for the WPSB incumbents published on Oct. 18 was ripped from far-right wing fear-mongering and so lacking in factual basis that it read as much like a satirical piece as a letter of support.

However, this letter did highlight the crux of the board election; despite the muddying of issues and politicization of a non-political office, this vote comes down to what we want this community’s children to learn. They can learn about and experience the world as it is, or they can be sheltered thus preventing exposure to values and ideals that may not conform to an individual’s upbringing.

Do we lack the confidence in the values we teach at home so much that we believe the exposure to different ways of life will destroy our children? Are we so afraid of change that we would limit their life experiences? If so, ask yourself why.

I’m fortunate I had the opportunity and support of my parents to leave our small farm and live in various places around the country to experience the diversity it offers. It has only expanded those lessons of love and caring I learned from a young age. I look forward to voting for Bryant, Barkley, and Knott.

Paul Jesse, Teller County

Letters to the Editor – 10/29/2023

From the Gazette

Any common ground?

When I hear from the incumbents, I think we might agree to put children first when it comes to decision making, that parent involvement is critical, and the focus of the schools should be on academics (plus technical subjects and trades).

Dig a little deeper, and it’s clear that many of us have widely different ideas of what those simple phrases mean when translated to school policy. If we really have common ground, we will not discover it through vilifying or stereotyping the other side. That only leads to the animosity we have been experiencing for the last two years.

Where we find we have different ideas, the only way to make sure the best policies are implemented is through open and healthy discussions — not through backroom deals and covertly implementing policy changes without public notice. It should be obvious by now that it’s an illusion to think vanquishing the other side will result in unity. Treating others who disagree with us as enemies only fuels fires that divide our community.

Public business needs to be conducted in public. The way to have excellent schools and heal our community is to promote vigorous debate about education. I support Keegan Barkley, Mike Knott, and Seth Bryant for school board because they have pledged to open lines of communication, rebuild relationships and listen to all members of the community — even those who disagree with them.

Holly Sample, Florissant

Letters to the Editor – 10/25/2023

The latest letters to the editor from the Courier (part 1, part 2):

True American Birthright

My family has voted conservative for over a century, and I’m grateful for our values of hard work, community pride, and respect for the Constitution. Generations of my family have fought wars to protect democracy, including my father. Though he grew up a sharecropper’s son in a farmhouse with no electricity or running water, and he’d never flown in an airplane before WWII, he courageously joined the Army Air Corps and went on to become a B-17 squadron leader who dropped 39 bombs a minute for 45 minutes over Berlin to end the Nazi’s fascist regime. Hitler killed himself 30 days later. The irony? David Illingworth of the current school board never counted on that.

Illingworth never imagined he’d be dealing with Verlin Reed’s daughter as well as a huge upswell of brave Woodland Park citizens who are far more patriotic than he ever dreamed. Instead, Illingworth tried to deny first amendment rights last March when he filmed protestors to fire those who called out the school board’s secret decisions, fiscal irresponsibility, historically inaccurate curriculum, and hostility toward parents and teachers. Those who dared to speak and bring in national press are not the “ultra-left Marxists” that the school board claims. In fact, they are our town’s heroes, particularly teachers who’ve risked jobs to tell the truth about the school board’s ineptitude and lies. It’s time to embrace our true American birthright by voting for candidates who care and respect democracy: Mike Knott, Keegan Barkley & Seth Bryant.

Diane Reed, Woodland Park

What I’ve Seen as a Parent

I am a parent who volunteers at my child’s school at least once a week. I have not seen the “union slate” boogeyman trying to push Critical Race Theory and pronouns onto students, as the incumbents like to say. What I have seen are teachers so dedicated to their community’s children that they are willing to accept $10,000 less in salary than if they were to make the short drive into Colorado Springs. I have seen teachers who have answered the higher calling to serve as an educator. I have seen teachers that genuinely care about our children.

This summer, WPSD lost approximately 35% of its teaching staff. There are still 15 positions open for this school year. 81 teachers broke the Board’s gag order and signed their names to a letter addressing the “incompetent leadership actively harming our students and community.” If not for the fear of retaliation and losing their jobs, I believe that there would have been many more signatures.

Why has the incumbent Board made this such a toxic environment for its teachers? If they succeed at driving away our teachers — not “union slate members,” but our neighbors — who will be left to teach our children? It is time we vote out this Board with its political agenda that has turned our children into political pawns. It is time to vote for those that support all voices. It is time to vote for Barkley, Bryant and Knott.

Allison Avery-Wollenhaupt, Woodland Park

Tearing the community apart

This school board is tearing this community apart.

Board director David Illingworth talked about ‘divide, scatter, conquer’ in his famous 2021 email to the other board members. He has delivered on that strategy.

Twenty-two months ago, hearing teachers in my school district say “we are not the enemy” caught my attention. I dug a little, learned a lot, and got sucked into a fight I never imagined. As a long-time parent in the district, I wasn’t going to sit back and watch the teachers suffer, with the kids ultimately paying the price.

I naively thought everyone supported our public schools. To my surprise, I’ve spent almost two years fighting a group of people actively working to dismantle the public education system that has helped make this country the best in the world. They brought in outsiders as part of their plan, and treated our children as experiments in education. Their motivation quickly became clear…some in that group are motivated by religion, some are motivated by political ideology, and for others, it’s only about the money.

I’m sure you have all witnessed the result of this board’s crusade…our community has never been more divided and full of anger. Woodland Park schools are in the news for all the wrong reasons. We can expect more of the same if the incumbents are re-elected, but we can also choose to change this instead.

Vote to heal the division in this community — vote for Keegan Barkley, Seth Bryant, and Mike Knott.

Matt Gawlowski, Woodland Park

School board turns to partisan politics

I live in Teller County because of the natural beauty and the promise of community offered by small town America. With great dismay I have watched the school board radicalize and turn towards partisan politics and an ideological political agenda instead of building community and educating our children in an evidence-based manner.

As a career police officer and former Police Chief, I have worked to build community and keep our children safe. Consequently, I am astonished by the choice to remove mental health services from our schools. Unaddressed mental health issues and adverse childhood experiences make it harder to learn and make our children vulnerable to victimization and crisis. Teaching the whole child includes their mental health.

Similarly, building a strong community means teaching our whole history, not just the parts that make some of us feel good like the untested and unproven partisan standards adopted by the school board. These choices make our children less safe and our communities less strong. Elected officials and community systems must serve everyone in the community including the minority, especially the minority.

The current school board blatantly rejects that core value in favor of ideology. They are intent on pushing a radicalized version of the will of the majority on all of our neighbors. I have attended school board meetings and have learned the values, ideas, and character of Keegan Barkley, Mike Knott, and Seth Bryant. I enthusiastically endorse and support their evidence-based, service-oriented, community-building approach to service and applaud their courage.

Fred Fletcher, Teller County

Ill-natured extremists

As a WP parent and lifelong resident of the area, I will attest that our traditional public schools are a foundational bedrock of our small communities. It is beyond disturbing to see unhinged attacks on our teachers and schools by ill-natured extremists who have taken power in the district Board of Education and school administration.

It is exceedingly clear from their propaganda, that they wholly consume their own misinformation. They haven’t taken the time to understand our schools, and don’t know that the true problems have nothing to do with the hot-button issues they’ve regurgitated from national political talking points.

Hyper-inflated concerns about the teachers’ union doesn’t even rank on the list of things that are hurting our children. It’s simply a scapegoat for instilling fear, and then using that fear as a tool for power. It may have worked in 1930s Germany, but it cannot be allowed to flourish now.

Being an American means fighting for your neighbors, not against them. It appears that most everyone understands this, except those who have chosen to make enemies out of their community while they declare their intent to divide, scatter, and conquer the very people they are supposed to represent. It’s incredibly sad that they’ve chosen our schools for their battleground. The true test of patriotism is the unwavering commitment to justice, equality, and the well-being of all members of society.

It’s time to return to civility. Please vote for Seth Bryant, Keegan Barkley, and Mike Knott to stop the destruction.

Jason Randolph, Woodland Park

Continued misinformation

Facts about politics and the School Board. Director Illingworth referred to the new candidates and “their politics”. The three persons running against the incumbents are receiving support from people associated with all political perspectives because they are promoting an ethical, professional school board. They are not seeking funding or support from any one party. In contrast, the incumbents are clearly aligned with a political party, campaigning from the Republican Party booth on the Fourth of July in Memorial Park and at the last election their ads were paid for by the Republican Party.

Facts about school enrollment. Director Illingworth states “student enrollment has grown”. This is not accurate. At the School Board meeting on October 11, 2023 it was announced that enrollment was 2,122 for 2002-23 and 2,020 for 2023-24. This is a decrease of 102 students or 5% of the enrollment.

Facts about teachers salaries. Teacher salaries increased every year since 2014, averaging at least 6% from 2016 to 2020. For over 40 years the School Board, administrators and teachers would meet to discuss the budget including salary increases. For the first time that process did not happen this year and teachers were given just a 5% increase.

Misinformation has to stop. Vote for Seth Bryant, Keegan Barkley and Mike Knott. They believe in open and transparent communication.

Darlene Schurr-Stewart, Woodland Park

My parental rights

My daughter started WPSD in 4th grade. She had been in 2 other districts which did not meet her needs, as we required a more traditional type of school. She has prospered in the traditional public schools here.

The incumbents talk about giving families ‘parental rights’ but to me it seems that everyone in the community has more ‘parental rights’ than I do as a parent. A few examples: the BOE taking away mental health options versus making them ‘opt in’ choices; the BOE forcing out beloved teachers instrumental in my child’s success (she lost 7 of her 8 teachers last year); Charis parishioners, packing the board meetings called out to support the current board, so parents are once again locked out and sub-par social studies standards imposed with no buy-in from parents (not approved by the state nor accredited by NCAA).

Will colleges take the same stance around the American Birthright Standards (ABS)? The Civic Alliance, the organization pushing ABS, advocates getting rid of AP classes. For kids that are college bound, these classes are extremely important to keep competitive. Will that be our next step? Slowly the BOE is eroding my choice for my child to remain in a diverse public school. There should be more choice, not less. Enough of the lack of transparency and chaos. Bring common sense back into our schools. Vote Keegan, Seth and Mike. 3 parents with kids in the schools they will serve.

Elizabeth Douglass, Florissant

We need common sense

I am writing in support of Keegan Barley’s excellent mediation and talent acquisition skills. I am writing in support of Mike Knott’s volunteerism and community building skills. I am writing in support of Seth Bryant’s management and IT skills. I need these people to restore the apolitical dedication to my child’s education and to bring back professionalism to WPSD. All three have exceptional management, volunteerism and community building experience and abilities.

My child needs their common sense and kindness. My child needs a team to empower parents, students, teachers and staff with respect and dignity. I want my son to learn more than memorized facts. I want my son to think. I want him to be a good citizen. I’m voting for hope and my son. I’m voting for Seth Bryant, Keegan Barkley and Mike Knott.

Johnathan Rooks, Woodland Park

Chaos hurts kids

I am writing as a former teacher at Gateway and Columbine Elementaries, a twelve-year principal at Columbine, and forty-five-year resident of Teller County. Post Woodland Park, I was principal of a charter school; worked as a researcher on organizational change; and coached low performing schools across the US.

A history of respectful dialog: Woodland Park has traditionally been a community of diverse beliefs, with differences resolved through honest conversation. I recall two School Board members, chairs of the Republican and Democratic parties, respectfully working together to create a strong culture for children’s learning. Board members treated the professional staff with the courtesy and respect their education and dedication deserved.

Chaos hurts kids: Creating chaos is a strategy now prevalent in the political world, and apparently adopted by the current board. They have driven away dedicated professionals and imposed their own political and religious beliefs on the schools. This is NOT the way to improve a school district — schools get better when teamwork INCREASES. Good schools use all the talent available to them and that cannot happen in a district overwhelmed by chaos.

Restoring respect: The education promoted by this board will produce graduates unprepared to enter a world far different than the Woodland Park of today. Your reputation as a desirable community to live, work, and do business will further deteriorate. Voters, why not choose to restore respectful dialog and rebuild trust? Support the three candidates who honor these traditional Woodland Park values.

Mike Galvin, Littleton

Why I support the challengers

I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for Bryant, Barkley and Knott who are running for WPSD School Board. All three have expressed the importance of prioritizing feedback from teachers, parents and students in their decision making processes. As a concerned community member and educational consultant for over 36 years, I believe it is crucial to have representatives who genuinely listen to and value input of those directly affected by their decisions. It is essential for the success and growth of WPSD.

Our school board plays a pivotal role in shaping the educational experiences of students. Parents, students and teachers are the primary stakeholders in our education system. It is important that the individuals elected to this position understand the importance of involving all stakeholders in the decision making process. We need school board members who are committed to fostering collaborative environment where parents, students and teachers feel heard, respected and valued. By electing these candidates, we can create a school system that truly reflects the needs and aspirations of our community.

I urge all community members to carefully consider these three candidates and vote for them in the upcoming school board election. Together, we can create a school system that values the input of teachers, parents and students, and work collaboratively to provide the best possible education for our children.

Sharon McMahon, Divide

Parental choice a subjective term

Parental choice is a buzzword currently. I think parental rights are very important, but I recognize that what parents want is very different for each family. We made educational choices in our family for the individual child at that point in their development. Those choices were the best for our family but they are not the best choices for other families.

There are several choices here in Woodland Park for education and I think that’s fantastic! What I do see very often, in the news and in social media are a lot of people for parental choice—but only the choice that they see as correct. There are times when I feel that some are even crossing the line beyond education and delving into parenting choices. There is a charter school, private school, homeschool and public school option here—allowing parents to make that choice for their own family. Allowing a variety of options is paramount to the success of school choice.

The American Birthright standards and the classical educational model of Merit are very similar. If there is no variety in education it is by default taking away parental choice for parents that feel differently. I believe that Knott, Barkley and Bryant will make it a goal to provide parental choice for all parents and that is why they will get my vote.

Shawn Stewart-MaddoxWoodland Park

We made a misstep

I think we have made a misstep. Apparently, we have injected political dogma into the education of our children. When my children were young, I was very concerned that Woodland Park Re-2 School District was not providing for my children’s needs. I stood with other interested and concerned parents to voice our concerns that there were proven approaches to education that were beneficial to children and why were the teachers in WP trying out other experimental approaches? We did not think in WP we had the financial support to attract the best and brightest educational minds to be conducting research: so why not focus on delivery of quality education? Seemed simple.

Over time the concerned parents found solutions for their children. Generally, there were 3: home schooling, relocation, and commuting to other venues in Colorado Springs. Changing the school district approach – not so much. We chose commuting. The results were spectacular.

In the last election cycle the school district was changed. And rather than changed to embrace proven educational methods and ideas, the district embraces ideas, approaches, and content that are not only questionable but of dubious value and employs people of similar bent whose history and practice has left a educational scar across Colorado.

We need to step back and bring a more reasoned approach to education in Teller county. Your vote for Seth Bryant, Mike Knott, and Keegan Barkley will bring balance and sanity back and restore promised education to our children.

Michael HaaseCripple Creek

Teachers for change

As a decades long teacher in WPSD, I know how critical this school board election is to the future success of our public schools and broader community.

Do we choose an incumbent board that has sowed discord and mistrust among staff, parents, and community, who have eliminated essential programs for the health and well being of our students, who have narrowed the academic focus of our schools to fit their particular ideology?

No, instead we should elect candidates who support a balanced, non ideological school system, one that is responsive to all student needs and parent concerns, that respects and honors the professionals who teach those students, Those candidates are Keegan Barkley, Seth Bryant, and Mike Knott.

I urge you to support these candidates who understand that teaching and learning are not political acts, that our public schools need to be responsive to all children and parents, not just those who happen to have a certain political or religious belief system.

Organizations are as strong as the diversity of their constituents, because when they eliminate open minded thought and communication, they become increasingly fear based. Fear based organizations like the current school board, create hatred and mistrust – not the hallmarks of learning.

I write on behalf of over a hundred retired staff of Woodland Park schools. We ask you to please honor the work we and current staff have done for your children, by voting for Knott, Bryant and Barkley. The future of our community depends on it!

Claudia MartinWoodland Park

Letters to the Editor – October 18, 2023

From the October 18, 2023 edition of the Courier, part 1, part 2:

Our family has owned a business in Florissant for 77 years, and I have been involved with the Woodland Park District for 35 years. As daughter, wife and mother of public school teachers and coaches, and having been one myself, I have a unique look at our district.

With the current Board, there has not been discussion or any collaboration on decisions such as choosing a new superintendent, changing the curriculum of the school, keeping the sixth graders in elementary (a parent survey indicated that a vast majority of them didn’t want that), turning down free grant money for mental health workers or dropping classes which were designed to better prepare students for college entrance exams. There has been no collaboration.

Historically, there hasn’t been a problem between the school district and the Teacher’s Association. The District freely allowed the teachers to meet in the buildings. The leadership was then allowed to be present during a Meet and Confer process with the administration which was collaborative, and, though the two parties didn’t always agree, the voices of all stakeholders were heard. They would eventually come to consensus decisions.

I love this District and hope for the best in the future. Choose candidates for the School Board who understand about educating the whole child and who understand the educational system. Please vote for Keegan Barkley, Mike Knott and Seth Bryant. They hope to remove partisan politics, implement mainstream standards and repair relationships with local teachers.

Suzie GrafFlorissant

I have seen our community connect with our public schools over 40 years in Teller County — first as a student, then as an alumni, a substitute, and as a parent. I’ve seen members of the community visit schools as volunteers, rally behind our sports teams, attend plays and concerts, fund-raise to build the beautiful Dickson Auditorium. All ways that connect our community to our schools and, in a healthy way, our students.

During the last two years, I have watched our community connect with our schools in a different way that raises concerns for me as a parent. I have watched and listened as people I have never seen at a play, game, fundraiser or as a volunteer assert themselves as experts on my child’s education and wellbeing. Some of these “experts” are hidden behind what they like to call “pseudonyms” — which begs us to question who they are and why they are so interested in our children.

These hidden voices arrived with the current Board of Education. I am uncomfortable with a Board that is supported by unknown “experts” and people who hide their identity. They say it is for their “safety.” What about our children’s safety from unwanted attention from anonymous adults? I hope that folks will consider voting for a change in November, so that perhaps we can stop the unwanted attention this board has brought our children. Please consider a vote for Bryant, Barkley and Knott, this parent’s choice.

Stephanie Merl, Woodland Park

I’m a Special Education teacher and applied last spring for open positions in Woodland Park Schools. I was looking to make a move and wanted to be closer to family in Colorado.

Ultimately, after an initial interview and the option to interview for other positions, I withdrew my application. Doing just an initial amount of research, I quickly found that Mr. Witt and the school board seem focused on culture war nonsense, implementing substandard curriculum via American Birthright, removing mental health supports for students and seem uniquely hostile to the school based staff.

As I withdrew, I wrote the school board to inform them exactly why I was withdrawing. That their hostility will harm their ability to attract and retain qualified staff. And lo and behold, the hard to fill Special Education positions are still open.

I know you have a school board election coming up, and I largely don’t have a dog in this fight but in all my years of working in Special Education, from therapeutic day schools, detention facilities, and traditional programs have I ever felt the need to withdraw an application.

I’ll tell the voters of Woodland Park the same thing I told the board, following Dave and his cohort will lead to a hallowing out of your school district and churn and burn among staff.

Justin JacksonBettendorf, Iowa

October 5, 80+ WPSD staff issued a joint statement of their concerns of the school board. (Recall 35% of staff quit last year.)

The superintendent’s response declared this a political tactic of the teacher’s union, effectively dismissing all concerns as irrelevant.

Though some belong to the union; many don’t. Many are known conservatives who sit with me in church, as well as others who agreed yet couldn’t sign, and supporting parents.

Why are 45% of the entire district’s teachers risking their employment by speaking publicly?

They believe the administration is not listening. They now appeal to the community.

Will we listen?

Let’s remain curious why our administration mislabels this as a union tactic. At the BOE meeting in May, why did they read a proclamation against the CEA’s anti-capitalism statement, yet not acknowledge our WPEA’s statement supporting capitalism?

Many are dismayed by recent leveraging of the district’s email system to all parents. It declared the union “bent on fostering a hatred of America in our youth,” and indirectly of “fear mongering” and a “false narrative.” This was to dispel “patently false” concerns the American Birthright curriculum was not NCAA accredited. Fact check: Per NCAA the district has not submitted these courses for accreditation.

Could these diversions be intended for deception? Are manipulation; suppression; and inflammatory, defamatory speech our example to children?

I am a conservative Christian paying close attention to this board’s actions. Please take advantage of the Chamber of Commerce recorded forum to get to know Barkley, Bryant, and Knott.

Carol GreenstreetWoodland Park

As a former Woodland Park teacher, I feel obligated to comment on the recent “official statement” from Superintendent Ken Witt.

Mr. Witt, I just read your official statement regarding the recent teacher press conference. How dare you question my patriotism! As a retired Woodland Park School District teacher and 25-year U.S. Navy Veteran, I’m beyond angry at your comment calling out my “hatred of America, and our community”. I’ve lived in and loved Woodland Park for 30+ years. Additionally, I was allowed to determine what was taught in my Social Studies classroom; a classroom that used State Standards to prepare students for the diverse culture they would find once they graduated. My service to the country and defense of the constitution has never been called into question until now.

Additionally, to “decline money earmarked for mental health services” is unconscionable. Then to go on to state that you’re leaving these vital services in the hands of the teachers who you’ve clearly admitted you don’t trust leaves me speechless.

Your hatred of teachers is evident, as well as your obvious disrespect for the veterans that have served in the district. It makes me wonder what your motives are. I personally stand with the teachers.

Mark S. DowningWoodland Park

How about those “parents’ rights?” I’m certainly not opposed to those. However, as parents of former students, let’s complicate things.

In addition to the usual rights claimed by the “patriots” among us, children have a few others that seem to get overlooked. In our minds, All Children Have A Right (ACHAR) to be well-fed, clothed, protected, loved, and nurtured. This is our obligation! ACHAR to objectively challenge their environment, their beliefs, and their unique thinking. ACHAR to our faith in them that they have the capacity to explore the world in new ways; free of us projecting our existential terrors onto them. ACHAR to come to school fully prepared with inquisitive minds and respectful behaviors learned at home and to which they may safely return with the same.

Our own children attended pre-K through 12th grade and, irrespective of district policies, not once did my family feel that our “parental rights” were negated. We have more faith in ourselves and our children than that. Both graduated with robust academic scholarships, and they have the former district structure to thank for that.

ACHAR to be provided this opportunity. We were conscious in our home of their rights, and there is truly a disconnect somewhere as there are far too many students coming to school bereft of these rights. How does that really happen? Where’s the real problem? Ask these of yourselves the next time you clamor for your own rights. Check your shoulder. The boogeyman isn’t at school.

Andrew PappadakisWoodland Park

The First Amendment, The WPSD School Board—and What You Should Know (guest column from the courier)

a guest column, from the October 11, 2023 Courier:

The First Amendment, The WPSD School Board—and What You Should Know

Imagine a local social studies teacher assigns an essay. Why does the first amendment matter right here? In your town, in your high school, in 2023?

You might coach your child that afternoon over your kitchen counter. The first amendment flings open the door for participation in our own government. It means your voice (yes, yours) matters. It allows dissent to those in power. So it’s the backbone, Johnny, of democracy.

Without that amendment, you’d explain, protests and marches could be squashed by officials or current trends. Members of certain groups could be punished.

But how would you tell him about our local school district?

Twice this spring, Woodland Park School District changed their policy, prohibiting employees from speaking about the district to the press or on social media without the superintendent’s permission. Violation meant insubordination; evidence in the form of strategic staff terminations supports this grievous reality.

U.S. District Court Judge Gallagher recently indicated portions of the policy “do have problems,” and proposed mediation between the teacher’s union and the school district.

Both parties agreed. Yet a response from the school district warned that dialing back the policy would embolden “dissident” teachers in an election year.

Hmm. Let’s look closer, Johnny. Wouldn’t those supporting the district be heard, too? What would the district want people not to say?

Would you want to know, Son?

You might explain the employees are taxpayers with rights to articulate their views of this government institution. Some are parents, now with no option to speak on behalf of their kids—despite the board’s purported value of parental rights.

During my own service on the Board of Education, it never occurred to the board to censor employees. Why would we? We can think critically about opinions that we encounter. We can ask for evidence of statements we question.

We conservatives have been focused on teaching the Constitution. And correctly pushing back against what we see as impingements to free speech. How can we specifically support this constitutional right?

The specific policy reasons they must “create and maintain a dignified and professionally responsible image for the school district.” Perhaps our students would ask us about board members who speak freely without any ability for staff to rebut their views, even with facts. And perhaps image-driven motivations should concern us less than created space for truth, integrity, and the value and freedom of every voice.

We must ask our kids, “In a democracy, are only those in powerful positions allowed to speak freely?”

Johnny, when it is stifled, we must ask: for what purpose?

By Carol Greenstreet

Letters to the Editor – October 11, 2023

(from the Courier)

Programs ditched for personal beliefs

Why would the current BoE dismantle effective, school-based mental health programs at a time when depression and anxiety in children is unprecedented? Why refuse to apply for grants effectively denying over a million dollars in help for WP students?

One part of our government said to not take money from “the government”. Others said to “focus on education”. And some, Mick Bates and Cassie Kimbrel, never said anything. These programs were ditched due to “strings” like ensuring care regardless of religion, color, sexual orientation or economic status and assessment of efficacy.

These programs were ditched for personal beliefs.

Now they have implemented Capturing Kids Hearts: teachers instruct students about an attribute to practice every month. An easy program for adults because they never have to address what a child may really be struggling with. Is this meaningful with 30 kids in a class? This program was rigorously evaluated and not effective in actually helping children.

Then the BoE contracted an out-of-town agency, MindSight, to provide mental health services in the school. Most providers are unlicensed students, although supervised, and serve multiple schools. MindSight bills the parents, their insurance and needs paperwork approval from parents. Is this information protected from the BoE or Superintendent? No crisis intervention offered.

You could have caring, screened, highly qualified providers at WPSD again. Their focus could solely be the well-being of children while partnering with parents, not personal agendas. Your kids could have better. Vote.

Patricia A PerryWoodland Park

Separating opinions and preferences from facts and interpretations

Claims being made by Woodland Park school board incumbents need attention. I’m concerned by how they and their supporters misrepresent data. For example, they manipulated teacher turnover. They didn’t count teacher retirements in turnover data, despite most retirees continuing to teach elsewhere, to look favorable to them.

Student growth is another shell game.

How can anyone know the difference without making it a part-time job? Watch for:

Cherry-picking: Recent guest editorial contributors and incumbent candidates present select data that support their argument while ignoring contradictory evidence. They overgeneralize from narrow data sets, making broad claims from spurious or anecdotal evidence.

Transparency: Without transparency or sharing decision methodologies, we can’t verify anything.

Biased Name-calling: We all interpret information to confirm pre-existing beliefs. This board refuses alternative perspectives as legitimate. They treat opposition as pestilence to distract and conquer, attack parents by name on FaceBook, and call candidates “liberal union hacks.”

We deserve board transparency, consideration of alternative viewpoints and proposals. I haven’t missed a board meeting, feeling gaslighted and ignored monthly. I am pro-public education and school choice. I’ve been concerned and involved since the appointments of Bates and Kimbrell.

Only Keegan, Barkley, and Knott are running honest campaigns that fully disclose the vast local financial and nonfinancial support received, not cherry-picked, hidden, or imbalanced. They are beholden to any no one person or group.

Only www.SupportWPSchools.com agonizes over data, cross-checking and validating everything to ensure no confirmation bias, transparently linking to all sources.

Trina HoeflingFlorissant

Letters to the Editor – First Amendment Rights

First Amendment Rights (from the Gazette)

Imagine a local social studies teacher assigns an essay. Why does the First Amendment matter right here? In your town, in your high school, in 2023?

You might coach your child that afternoon over your kitchen counter. The First Amendment flings open the door for participation in our own government. It means your voice (yes, yours) matters. It allows dissent to those in power. So it’s the backbone, Johnny, of democracy.

Without that amendment, you’d explain, protests and marches could be squashed by officials or current trends. Members of certain groups could be punished. But how would you tell him about our local school district?

Twice this spring, Woodland Park School District changed their policy, prohibiting employees from speaking about the district to the press or on social media without the superintendent’s permission.

Violation meant insubordination; evidence in the form of strategic staff terminations supports this grievous reality.

U.S. District Court Judge Gallagher recently indicated portions of the policy “do have problems,” and proposed mediation between the teacher’s union and the school district.

Both parties agreed. Yet a response from the school district warned that dialing back the policy would embolden “dissident” teachers in an election year.

Hmm. Let’s look closer, Johnny. Wouldn’t those supporting the district be heard, too? What would the district want people not to say?

You might explain the employees are taxpayers with rights to articulate their views of this government institution. Some are parents, now with no option to speak on behalf of their kids—despite the board’s purported value of parental rights.

During my own service on the Board of Education, it never occurred to the board to censor employees.

Why would we? We can think critically about opinions that we encounter. We can ask for evidence of statements we question.

We conservatives have been focused on teaching the Constitution. And correctly pushing back against what we see as impingement to free speech. How can we specifically support this constitutional right?

The specific policy reasons they must “create and maintain a dignified and professionally responsible image for the school district.” Perhaps our students would ask us about board members who speak freely without any ability for staff to rebut their views, even with facts. And perhaps image-driven

motivations should concern us less than created space for truth, integrity, and the value and freedom of every voice.

We must ask our kids, “In a democracy, are only those in powerful positions allowed to speak freely?” Johnny, when it is stifled, we must ask: for what purpose?

Carol Greenstreet
Woodland Park